Madonna (painting): Difference between revisions
m (1 revision) |
RachelShuman (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====Date: [[:Category: | ====Date: [[:Category:1991|1991]]==== | ||
====Region: [[:Category:North America|North America | ====Region: [[:Category:North America|North America]]==== | ||
====Subject: [[:Category:Nudity|Nudity | ====Subject: [[:Category:Nudity|Nudity]]==== | ||
====Medium: [[:Category:Painting|Painting | ====Medium: [[:Category:Painting|Painting]]==== | ||
---- | ---- | ||
'''Artist:''' Dayton Claudio | '''Artist:''' Dayton Claudio | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
'''Description of Artwork:''' A 9' by 5' acrylic painting of a female nude entitled Madonna. | '''Description of Artwork:''' A 9' by 5' acrylic painting of a female nude entitled Madonna. | ||
'''The Incident:''' In response to complaints by several employees, a General Services Administration (GSA) field officer ordered | '''The Incident:''' In response to complaints by several employees, a General Services Administration (GSA) field officer ordered the painting to be draped in black plastic. The painting, challenged for including nudity, was on display at a GSA building, the Sacramento, California Federal Building. Ironically, it was placed next to a case displaying a copy of the Bill of Rights. Claudio's painting appeared at the Federal Building as part of the GSA's "Living Buildings" program. The program provides a space in public buildings for artists to show their work. No federal grants are involved. The employees submitted a complaint stating that nudity was not appropriate for the workplace. One woman commented that to display the painting immediately following the Clarance Thomas/Anita Hill hearings was "pretty tacky." John Habein, GSA field office manager, honored the employee's request and ordered the painting to be covered or removed. | ||
'''Results of Incident:''' Dayton Claudio refused to remove the painting, saying, "It celebrates the beauty of the human form. It is not political, sexist or erotic." By the end of the week, GSA official Mary Filippini reversed Habein, instructing that the painting remain on display. Filippini said that there had been "some complaints by some of the tenants of the building, but you're going to find complaints on virtually any artwork you put up." | '''Results of Incident:''' Dayton Claudio refused to remove the painting, saying, "It celebrates the beauty of the human form. It is not political, sexist or erotic." By the end of the week, GSA official Mary Filippini reversed Habein, instructing that the painting remain on display. Filippini said that there had been "some complaints by some of the tenants of the building, but you're going to find complaints on virtually any artwork you put up." | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
'''Source:''' People for the American Way | '''Source:''' People for the American Way | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:1991]] | ||
[[Category:]] | [[Category:1990s]] | ||
[[Category:]] | [[Category:20th century]] | ||
[[Category:North America]] | [[Category:North America]] | ||
[[Category:]] | [[Category:United States]] | ||
[[Category:]] | [[Category:California]] | ||
[[Category:Sacramento]] | |||
[[Category:Nudity]] | [[Category:Nudity]] | ||
[[Category:Painting]] | [[Category:Painting]] | ||
[[Category:Dayton Claudio]] | [[Category:Dayton Claudio]] | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="font-style: italic;">Madonna</span> (painting)}} | |||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
Latest revision as of 21:58, 27 July 2011
Date: 1991
Region: North America
Subject: Nudity
Medium: Painting
Artist: Dayton Claudio
Confronting Bodies: Employees at the General Services Administration Federal Building
Dates of Action: 1991
Location: Sacramento, California
Description of Artwork: A 9' by 5' acrylic painting of a female nude entitled Madonna.
The Incident: In response to complaints by several employees, a General Services Administration (GSA) field officer ordered the painting to be draped in black plastic. The painting, challenged for including nudity, was on display at a GSA building, the Sacramento, California Federal Building. Ironically, it was placed next to a case displaying a copy of the Bill of Rights. Claudio's painting appeared at the Federal Building as part of the GSA's "Living Buildings" program. The program provides a space in public buildings for artists to show their work. No federal grants are involved. The employees submitted a complaint stating that nudity was not appropriate for the workplace. One woman commented that to display the painting immediately following the Clarance Thomas/Anita Hill hearings was "pretty tacky." John Habein, GSA field office manager, honored the employee's request and ordered the painting to be covered or removed.
Results of Incident: Dayton Claudio refused to remove the painting, saying, "It celebrates the beauty of the human form. It is not political, sexist or erotic." By the end of the week, GSA official Mary Filippini reversed Habein, instructing that the painting remain on display. Filippini said that there had been "some complaints by some of the tenants of the building, but you're going to find complaints on virtually any artwork you put up."
Source: People for the American Way
