View source for Talk:Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation

This article is missing a considerable amount of information --[[User:Jackie Sider|Jackie Sider]] 11:50, 3 February 2012 (PST)


There has been a recent Supreme Court decision relating to the lack of clear definition of  indecency on the airwaves at the FCC, especially with the proliferation of cable and on-demand channels where no such restrictions exist.  Consequently, there is speculation that the Pacifica "Carlin" decision should be revisited and thrown out altogether.