Portrait of Ms Ruby May, Standing (painting): Difference between revisions

no edit summary
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Display censorship incident
{{Display censorship incident
|ongoing=yes
|ongoing=no
|year=2014
|year=2014
|region=Europe
|region=Europe
|artist=Leena McCall
|artist=Leena McCall
|subject=Explicit Sexuality
|subject=Explicit Sexuality, Nudity
|confronting_bodies=The Mall Gallery, London
|confronting_bodies=The Mall Gallery, London
|medium=Painting
|medium=Painting
Line 15: Line 15:
|description_of_result=The Mall Gallery has declined to comment on the censorship.
|description_of_result=The Mall Gallery has declined to comment on the censorship.
Artist Leena McCall has asked supporters to speak out via Twitter and Facebook.
Artist Leena McCall has asked supporters to speak out via Twitter and Facebook.
The case is ongoing.
|image=PortraitOfMsRubyMayStanding.jpg
|source=http://www.artlyst.com/articles/mall-gallery-removes-leena-mccall-painting-deemed-too-pornographic-and-disgusting
|source=http://www.artlyst.com/articles/mall-gallery-removes-leena-mccall-painting-deemed-too-pornographic-and-disgusting
}}
}}
[[File:PortraitOfMsRubyMayStanding.jpg|right|bottom|400x400px]]
[https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2014/jul/07/painting-pornographic-pubic-hair-outrage How is this painting 'pornographic' and 'disgusting'?]
[http://www.complex.com/style/2014/07/painting-removed-from-a-gallery-in-london-because-of-pubic-hair This Painting by Leena McCall Was Removed From a Gallery in London Because of "Disgusting" Pubic Hair, by Andrew LaSane]
[http://artdaily.com/news/71179/London-gallery-removes-Leena-McCall-painting-deemed-too-pornographic-and-disgusting#.V_gCA5MrLeQ London gallery removes Leena McCall painting deemed too pornographic and disgusting]
744

edits