Under the Dome: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{Display censorship incident |ongoing=yes |year=2015 |region=Asia |artist=Chai Jing |subject=Government Secrecy, Political/Economic/Social Opinion, Science |confronting_bodi...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|subject=Government Secrecy, Political/Economic/Social Opinion, Science | |subject=Government Secrecy, Political/Economic/Social Opinion, Science | ||
|confronting_bodies=Chinese Government | |confronting_bodies=Chinese Government | ||
|medium=Film | |medium=Film Video | ||
|date_of_action=February 27, 2015 | |date_of_action=February 27, 2015 | ||
|location=China | |location=China | ||
Revision as of 15:18, 14 November 2016
Artist: Chai Jing
Year: 2015
Date of Action: February 27, 2015
Region: Asia
Location: China
Subject: Government Secrecy, Political/Economic/Social Opinion, Science
Medium: Film Video
Confronting Bodies: Chinese Government
Description of Artwork: "Under the Dome" is a documentary about air pollution in China. Facts about the detrimental effects of air pollution on the environment and on the health of Chinese citizens are presented in a straightforward manner by Ms. Jing. She also interviews members of the Ministry of Environmental Protection, illustrating the inability of the Ministry to enforce environmental laws due to the power hierarchy present within the Chinese government.
The Incident: The documentary was removed from major Chinese video websites a week after its release date. As the film became viral within China due to its content, the Communist Party's central propaganda department demanded its removal from the internet. At first, the central propaganda department demanded the film not be reported on and it could not be featured on home pages, but as the film gained momentum, its removal from the internet was deemed necessary by the propaganda department.
Results of Incident: The removal of this documentary from the internet has sparked conversations within China as to which government party was in support of the video and which wanted it to be removed; the desire to have this video removed may reflect an inability to have productive conversations about the future of China's environment.
