Nacken (Painting by Alv Wilenius): Difference between revisions
RachelShuman (talk | contribs) |
RachelShuman (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====Date: [[:Category: | ====Date: [[:Category:1995|1995]]==== | ||
====Region: [[:Category:North America|North America | ====Region: [[:Category:North America|North America]]==== | ||
====Subject: [[:Category:Explicit Sexuality|Explicit Sexuality] | ====Subject: [[:Category:Explicit Sexuality|Explicit Sexuality]]]==== | ||
====Medium: [[:Category:Painting|Painting | ====Medium: [[:Category:Painting|Painting]]==== | ||
---- | ---- | ||
'''Artist:''' Alv Wilenius | '''Artist:''' Alv Wilenius | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
'''Location:''' Quicksliver Mine Co., Guerneville, California | '''Location:''' Quicksliver Mine Co., Guerneville, California | ||
'''Description of Artwork:''' The painting depicts a nude image of Naken, a male Scandinavian god, pulling a nude male victim under water. Nacken's hands and head are in proximity to the victim's penis. | '''Description of Artwork:''' The painting depicts a nude image of Naken, a male Scandinavian god, pulling a nude male victim under water. Nacken's hands and head are in proximity to the victim's penis. | ||
'''The Incident:''' A local hair dresser complained to the gallery owners that the painting was obscene and would be offensive to tourists and harmful to children. The gallery owners took no action. Then the hair dresser complained to the police who contacted the gallery owners and informed then that they might be in violation of local obscenity laws. | '''The Incident:''' A local hair dresser complained to the gallery owners that the painting was obscene and would be offensive to tourists and harmful to children. The gallery owners took no action. Then the hair dresser complained to the police who contacted the gallery owners and informed then that they might be in violation of local obscenity laws. | ||
'''Results of Incident:''' The gallery owners covered the "offensive" portion of the painting until they contacted the Assistant District Attorney regarding the issue of the paintings obscenity. The ADA told them the painting was not obscene because it had serious artistic and literary value. The owners then kept the painting in the window uncovered. | '''Results of Incident:''' The gallery owners covered the "offensive" portion of the painting until they contacted the Assistant District Attorney regarding the issue of the paintings obscenity. The ADA told them the painting was not obscene because it had serious artistic and literary value. The owners then kept the painting in the window uncovered. | ||
'''Source:''' NCAC: based on a report in "Artistic Freedom Under Attack" Vol. 3 1995, provided by People for the American Way | '''Source:''' NCAC: based on a report in "Artistic Freedom Under Attack" Vol. 3 1995, provided by People for the American Way | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:1995]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:1990s]] | ||
[[Category:North America]] | [[Category:North America]] | ||
[[Category:]] | [[Category:United States]] | ||
[[Category:]] | [[Category:California]] | ||
[[Category:Explicit Sexuality]] | [[Category:Explicit Sexuality]] | ||
[[Category:Painting]] | [[Category:Painting]] | ||
[[Category:Alv Wilenius]] | [[Category:Alv Wilenius]] | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="font-style: italic;">Nacken</span>}} | |||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
Revision as of 15:51, 26 July 2011
Date: 1995
Region: North America
Subject: Explicit Sexuality]
Medium: Painting
Artist: Alv Wilenius
Confronting Bodies: Local citizen, sheriff's office
Dates of Action: 1995
Location: Quicksliver Mine Co., Guerneville, California
Description of Artwork: The painting depicts a nude image of Naken, a male Scandinavian god, pulling a nude male victim under water. Nacken's hands and head are in proximity to the victim's penis.
The Incident: A local hair dresser complained to the gallery owners that the painting was obscene and would be offensive to tourists and harmful to children. The gallery owners took no action. Then the hair dresser complained to the police who contacted the gallery owners and informed then that they might be in violation of local obscenity laws.
Results of Incident: The gallery owners covered the "offensive" portion of the painting until they contacted the Assistant District Attorney regarding the issue of the paintings obscenity. The ADA told them the painting was not obscene because it had serious artistic and literary value. The owners then kept the painting in the window uncovered.
Source: NCAC: based on a report in "Artistic Freedom Under Attack" Vol. 3 1995, provided by People for the American Way
