Boys at Bat: Difference between revisions

From Censorpedia

No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
====Date: [[:Category:1985 - 1995|1985 - 1995]] [[:Category:|]] [[:Category:|]]====
====Date: [[:Category:1989|1989]]====


====Region: [[:Category:North America|North America]] [[:Category:|]] [[:Category:|{location3}]]====
====Region: [[:Category:North America|North America]]====


====Subject: [[:Category:Sexual/Gender Orientation|Sexual/Gender Orientation]] [[:Category:|]] [[:Category:|]]====
====Subject: [[:Category:Sexual/Gender Orientation|Sexual/Gender Orientation]]====


====Medium: [[:Category:Painting|Painting]] [[:Category:|]] [[:Category:|]]====
====Medium: [[:Category:Painting|Painting]]====
----
----
'''Artist:''' Eric Fischl
'''Artist:''' Eric Fischl
Line 15: Line 15:
'''Location:''' Chicago, Illinois
'''Location:''' Chicago, Illinois


'''Description of Artwork:''' "Boys at Bat" is a painting of a picnic scene with a father and son. The father, completely nude except for a baseball cap, is swinging a baseball bat while the son stands aside holding a bat staring.
'''Description of Artwork:''' The painting was shown in the baseball art exhibit ''Diamonds Are Forever'', sponsored by Worldwide Cultural Affairs and American Express Company at the Chicago Cultural Center. ''Boys at Bat'' depicts a picnic scene with a father and son. The father, completely nude except for a baseball cap, is swinging a baseball bat while the son stands aside holding a bat staring.


'''The Incident:''' "Diamonds Are Forever," a baseball art exhibit sponsored by Worldwide Cultural Affairs and American Express Company at the Chicago Cultural Center. Sistrunk alleged the painting promotes sexual molestation and homosexuality while using baseball as a front. He met with Cultural Center officials requesting the removal of the painting.
'''The Incident:''' Sistrunk alleged the painting promotes sexual molestation and homosexuality while using baseball as a front. He met with Cultural Center officials requesting the removal of the painting.


'''Results of Incident:''' The painting remained with the support of the Cultural Center and American Express.
'''Results of Incident:''' The painting remained with the support of the Cultural Center and American Express.
Line 23: Line 23:
'''Source:''' Committee For Artists' Rights Archive
'''Source:''' Committee For Artists' Rights Archive


[[Category:1985 - 1995]]
[[Category:1989]]
[[Category:]]
[[Category:1980s]]
[[Category:]]
[[Category:20th century]]
[[Category:North America]]
[[Category:North America]]
[[Category:]]
[[Category:Illinois]]
[[Category:]]
[[Category:Chicago]]
[[Category:Sexual/Gender Orientation]]
[[Category:Sexual/Gender Orientation]]
[[Category:]]
[[Category:]]
[[Category:Painting]]
[[Category:Painting]]
[[Category:]]
[[Category:]]
[[Category:Eric Fischl]]
[[Category:Eric Fischl]]
{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="font-style: italic;">Boys at Bat</span>}}


__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__

Latest revision as of 16:29, 27 July 2011

Date: 1989

Region: North America

Subject: Sexual/Gender Orientation

Medium: Painting


Artist: Eric Fischl

Confronting Bodies: Ziff Sistrunk, executive director of Chicago Sports Council

Dates of Action: July, 1989

Location: Chicago, Illinois

Description of Artwork: The painting was shown in the baseball art exhibit Diamonds Are Forever, sponsored by Worldwide Cultural Affairs and American Express Company at the Chicago Cultural Center. Boys at Bat depicts a picnic scene with a father and son. The father, completely nude except for a baseball cap, is swinging a baseball bat while the son stands aside holding a bat staring.

The Incident: Sistrunk alleged the painting promotes sexual molestation and homosexuality while using baseball as a front. He met with Cultural Center officials requesting the removal of the painting.

Results of Incident: The painting remained with the support of the Cultural Center and American Express.

Source: Committee For Artists' Rights Archive