Mapplethorpe: The Perfect Moment (exhibition): Difference between revisions

From Censorpedia

No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:190128 r33620.webp|thumb]]
====Date: [[:Category:1990|1990]]====
====Date: [[:Category:1990|1990]]====


Line 7: Line 8:
====Medium: [[:Category:Photography|Photography]]====
====Medium: [[:Category:Photography|Photography]]====
----
----
'''Artist:''' Robert Mapplethorpe, Contemporary Arts Center
'''Artist:''' Robert Mapplethorpe, Contemporary Arts Center of Cincinnati


'''Confronting Bodies:''' Cincinnati City officials
'''Confronting Bodies:''' Cincinnati City officials
Line 15: Line 16:
'''Location:''' Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
'''Location:''' Cincinnati, Ohio, USA


'''Description of Artwork:''' A retrospective show for the late [[Robert Mapplethorpe]] which spanned twenty-five years of his career. The comprehensive work included celebrity portraits, self portraits, many nude images (some of which were children), flowers, and sadomasochistic activities. The exhibition opened at the Institute of Contemporary Arts in Philadelphia in the winter of 1988.  
'''Description of Artwork:''' A retrospective show for the late Robert Mapplethorpe which spanned twenty-five years of his career. The comprehensive work included celebrity portraits, self portraits, many nude images (some of which depicted children in various stages of undress), flowers, and sadomasochistic activities. The exhibition opened at the Institute of Contemporary Arts in Philadelphia in the winter of 1988.  


'''The Incident:''' Many observers and elected officials were extremely disturbed and upset by the nudity of both adults and children in the works and believed that the work was not in accordance with pornography laws in Ohio.  
'''The Incident:''' Many observers and elected officials were extremely disturbed and upset by the nudity of both adults and children in the works and believed that the work was not in accordance with pornography laws in Ohio.  


'''Results of Incident:''' Officials of the Contemporary Arts Center of Cincinnati tried to be prudent: they restricted access to the museum to those over 18 and relegated the most disturbing and explicit of the 175 photographs to a separate, further isolated room. This was not enough, however, to keep a local sheriff from staging a raid on the exhibit and seeking indictments against museum director Dennis Barrie on obscenity charges; nor was it enough to keep the grand jury from handing up an indictment. Although it was deemed criminal to possess "kiddie-porn materials," the Ohio laws leave legitimate museum displays unaffected by this law. Dennis Barie was acquitted, but this incident sparked debate about what is appropriate for the government to control regarding the content of art.  
'''Results of Incident:''' Officials of the Contemporary Arts Center of Cincinnati restricted access to the museum to those over 18 and relegated the most explicit of the 175 photographs to a separate, further-isolated room. This was not enough, however, to keep a local sheriff from staging a raid on the exhibition and seeking indictments against museum director Dennis Barrie on obscenity charges; nor was it enough to keep the grand jury from handing up an indictment. Although Ohio law deemed it criminal to possess "kiddie-porn materials," legitimate museum displays were an exception. Dennis Barie and the Contemporary Arts Center of Cincinnati were acquitted, but this incident sparked a national debate about what is appropriate for the government to control regarding the content of art. The context these debates created was inhospitable to free expression, particularly artistic renditions of the naked and the nude. Only a year later, another national controversy erupted over the display of lascivious artwork, this time over a print of a Goya painting displayed in a public university classroom. Throughout the decade, controversies over provocative art which received public funding led right-wing Senators like Jesse Helms to campaign for the National Endowment for the Arts to be de-funded.




'''Source:''' Committee For Artists' Rights Archive
'''Source:''' <br> • http://articles.latimes.com/1990-04-19/entertainment/ca-2114_1_contemporary-arts-center-mapplethorpe-images-mapplethorpe-controversy <br>
• http://www.nytimes.com/1990/10/06/us/cincinnati-jury-acquits-museum-in-mapplethorpe-obscenity-case.html <br>
• https://www.thefire.org/news/comeback-catechism-when-todays-speech-norms-launch-old-inquisitions


{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="font-style: italic;">Mapplethorpe: The Perfect Moment</span> (exhibition)}}
{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="font-style: italic;">Mapplethorpe: The Perfect Moment</span> (exhibition)}}

Latest revision as of 16:32, 24 July 2023

190128 r33620.webp

Date: 1990

Region: North America

Subject: Sexual/Gender Orientation, Explicit Sexuality, Nudity

Medium: Photography


Artist: Robert Mapplethorpe, Contemporary Arts Center of Cincinnati

Confronting Bodies: Cincinnati City officials

Dates of Action: 1990

Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Description of Artwork: A retrospective show for the late Robert Mapplethorpe which spanned twenty-five years of his career. The comprehensive work included celebrity portraits, self portraits, many nude images (some of which depicted children in various stages of undress), flowers, and sadomasochistic activities. The exhibition opened at the Institute of Contemporary Arts in Philadelphia in the winter of 1988.

The Incident: Many observers and elected officials were extremely disturbed and upset by the nudity of both adults and children in the works and believed that the work was not in accordance with pornography laws in Ohio.

Results of Incident: Officials of the Contemporary Arts Center of Cincinnati restricted access to the museum to those over 18 and relegated the most explicit of the 175 photographs to a separate, further-isolated room. This was not enough, however, to keep a local sheriff from staging a raid on the exhibition and seeking indictments against museum director Dennis Barrie on obscenity charges; nor was it enough to keep the grand jury from handing up an indictment. Although Ohio law deemed it criminal to possess "kiddie-porn materials," legitimate museum displays were an exception. Dennis Barie and the Contemporary Arts Center of Cincinnati were acquitted, but this incident sparked a national debate about what is appropriate for the government to control regarding the content of art. The context these debates created was inhospitable to free expression, particularly artistic renditions of the naked and the nude. Only a year later, another national controversy erupted over the display of lascivious artwork, this time over a print of a Goya painting displayed in a public university classroom. Throughout the decade, controversies over provocative art which received public funding led right-wing Senators like Jesse Helms to campaign for the National Endowment for the Arts to be de-funded.


Source:
http://articles.latimes.com/1990-04-19/entertainment/ca-2114_1_contemporary-arts-center-mapplethorpe-images-mapplethorpe-controversy
http://www.nytimes.com/1990/10/06/us/cincinnati-jury-acquits-museum-in-mapplethorpe-obscenity-case.html
https://www.thefire.org/news/comeback-catechism-when-todays-speech-norms-launch-old-inquisitions