Betsy Schneider's images of nude daughter (photographs): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====Date: [[:Category: | ====Date: [[:Category:2004|2004]]==== | ||
====Region: [[:Category:Europe|Europe]]==== | |||
====Subject: [[:Category:Nudity|Nudity]]==== | |||
====Medium: [[:Category:Photography|Photography]]==== | |||
====Medium: [[:Category:Photography|Photography | |||
---- | ---- | ||
[[File:scenes.png|right|200px]] | |||
'''Artist:''' Betsy Schneider | '''Artist:''' Betsy Schneider | ||
'''Confronting Bodies:''' Spitz Gallery | '''Confronting Bodies:''' Spitz Gallery | ||
'''Dates of Action:''' March, 2004 | |||
'''Dates of Action:''' March 2004 | |||
'''Location:''' London, England | '''Location:''' London, England | ||
'''Description of Artwork:''' Schneider's photographs are separated into three blocks. One consists of photographs of her daughter, nude, at nine months old, another of her daughter at two years old and the last of her daughter at five. The child holds various poses in the photographs. The piece is meant to show time, change and growth. The photos of her daughter at five caused the most controversy. <P> | '''Description of Artwork:''' Schneider's photographs are separated into three blocks. One consists of photographs of her daughter, nude, at nine months old, another of her daughter at two years old and the last of her daughter at five. The child holds various poses in the photographs. The piece is meant to show time, change and growth. The photos of her daughter at five caused the most controversy. <P> | ||
'''The Incident:''' Schneider's piece exhibited in the Spitz Gallery in Spitalfield's Market, London, during a festival celebrating female writers. The London tabloid, ''The Sun'', published a scandalized article claiming the work was child pornography. Gallery owners became cautious of violating the law and notified Scotland Yard after visitors complained about the images, and one visitor allegedly took photographs of Schneider's piece. | |||
'''The Incident:''' Schneider's piece exhibited in the Spitz Gallery in Spitalfield's Market, London, during a festival celebrating female writers. The London tabloid, The Sun, published a scandalized article claiming the work was child pornography. Gallery owners became cautious of violating the law and notified Scotland Yard after visitors complained about the images, and one visitor allegedly took photographs of Schneider's piece. | |||
A similar case emerged in 2001, when London police threatened to seize photos of photographer Tierney Gearon's children in the nude. In 2001 former culture minister Chris Smith decided that the officers crossed a mark between probity and censorship, and spoke in support of the images. <P> | A similar case emerged in 2001, when London police threatened to seize photos of photographer Tierney Gearon's children in the nude. In 2001 former culture minister Chris Smith decided that the officers crossed a mark between probity and censorship, and spoke in support of the images. <P> | ||
'''Results of Incident:''' The gallery blackened its windows, covered Schneider's work, and closed for one afternoon. The next day it reopened with three other artist's work, but removed Schneider's. Police suggested that they lacked the expertise to judge whether or not the piece was obscene. They referred the issue to the Metropolitan Police obscene publications unit. <P> | '''Results of Incident:''' The gallery blackened its windows, covered Schneider's work, and closed for one afternoon. The next day it reopened with three other artist's work, but removed Schneider's. Police suggested that they lacked the expertise to judge whether or not the piece was obscene. They referred the issue to the Metropolitan Police obscene publications unit. <P> | ||
'''Source:''' The Guardian | '''Source:''' The Guardian | ||
| Line 49: | Line 30: | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:2004]] | ||
[[Category:]] | [[Category:2000s]] | ||
[[Category:]] | [[Category:21st century]] | ||
[[Category:Europe]] | [[Category:Europe]] | ||
[[Category:]] | [[Category:England]] | ||
[[Category:]] | [[Category:London]] | ||
[[Category:Nudity]] | [[Category:Nudity]] | ||
[[Category:Photography]] | [[Category:Photography]] | ||
[[Category:]] | [[Category:Betsy Schneider]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Spitz Gallery]] | ||
[[Category:The Sun]] | |||
[[Category:For review]] | |||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="font-style: italic;">Scenes</span> (exhibition)}} | |||
Latest revision as of 20:43, 15 November 2016
Date: 2004
Region: Europe
Subject: Nudity
Medium: Photography
Artist: Betsy Schneider
Confronting Bodies: Spitz Gallery
Dates of Action: March, 2004
Location: London, England
Description of Artwork: Schneider's photographs are separated into three blocks. One consists of photographs of her daughter, nude, at nine months old, another of her daughter at two years old and the last of her daughter at five. The child holds various poses in the photographs. The piece is meant to show time, change and growth. The photos of her daughter at five caused the most controversy.
The Incident: Schneider's piece exhibited in the Spitz Gallery in Spitalfield's Market, London, during a festival celebrating female writers. The London tabloid, The Sun, published a scandalized article claiming the work was child pornography. Gallery owners became cautious of violating the law and notified Scotland Yard after visitors complained about the images, and one visitor allegedly took photographs of Schneider's piece. A similar case emerged in 2001, when London police threatened to seize photos of photographer Tierney Gearon's children in the nude. In 2001 former culture minister Chris Smith decided that the officers crossed a mark between probity and censorship, and spoke in support of the images.
Results of Incident: The gallery blackened its windows, covered Schneider's work, and closed for one afternoon. The next day it reopened with three other artist's work, but removed Schneider's. Police suggested that they lacked the expertise to judge whether or not the piece was obscene. They referred the issue to the Metropolitan Police obscene publications unit.
Source: The Guardian
