The Black Envelope (book): Difference between revisions
RachelShuman (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Jackie Sider (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
'''Artist:''' Norman Manea | '''Artist:''' Norman Manea | ||
'''Confronting Bodies:''' Council for Socialist Culture and Education | '''Confronting Bodies:''' Council for Socialist Culture and Education | ||
'''Dates of Action:''' 1986 | '''Dates of Action:''' 1986 | ||
'''Location:''' Romania | '''Location:''' Romania | ||
'''Description of Artwork:''' While Manea's writing does not criticize the leaders of the communist Romania he lived under directly, he does write about life under the regime. In ''The Black Envelope'', he not only writes on the negative aspects of daily life in contemporary Romania, but makes parallels to between it and Nazi Germany. <P> | '''Description of Artwork:''' While Manea's writing does not criticize the leaders of the communist Romania he lived under directly, he does write about life under the regime. In ''The Black Envelope'', he not only writes on the negative aspects of daily life in contemporary Romania, but makes parallels to between it and Nazi Germany. <P> | ||
'''The Incident:''' When Manea submitted the novel in 1985, he was expected not only to have the work submitted to the censors, but to self-censor himself as well. When the manuscript was sent back to him, 80 percent of the text had objections written over it. Words such as "food lines" and "anti-Semitism" had been deemed unacceptable and he had basically been asked to rewrite most of the book. <P> | '''The Incident:''' When Manea submitted the novel in 1985, he was expected not only to have the work submitted to the censors, but to self-censor himself as well. When the manuscript was sent back to him, 80 percent of the text had objections written over it. Words such as "food lines" and "anti-Semitism" had been deemed unacceptable and he had basically been asked to rewrite most of the book. <P> | ||
After the novel had been revised and rejected several times, the publisher found a new censor to look over it. This censor demanded even more outrageous revisions. He saw the link Manea had made between Romania and Nazi Germany. He demanded an anti-fascist movement be included, even though Romania never had one. Hitler and Stalin's differences were to be clearly defined. The negative view of daily life was ordered to be eliminated. Characters on the brink of suicide would need to be changed to be more positive. <P> | After the novel had been revised and rejected several times, the publisher found a new censor to look over it. This censor demanded even more outrageous revisions. He saw the link Manea had made between Romania and Nazi Germany. He demanded an anti-fascist movement be included, even though Romania never had one. Hitler and Stalin's differences were to be clearly defined. The negative view of daily life was ordered to be eliminated. Characters on the brink of suicide would need to be changed to be more positive. <P> | ||
'''Results of Incident:''' Menea followed the orders of the censors and had ''The Black Envelope'' published. In late 1986, he emigrated to the United States. Even though he got it published, he considers ''The Black Envelope'' to be corrupt and now expresses a very pessimistic view of communist censorship. <P> | |||
'''Results of Incident:''' Menea followed the orders of the censors and had ''The Black Envelope'' published. In late 1986, he emigrated to the United States. Even though he got it published, he considers | |||
'''Source:''' Censorship: A World Encyclopedia. Ed. Derek Jones. Chicago; London: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2001. | '''Source:''' Censorship: A World Encyclopedia. Ed. Derek Jones. Chicago; London: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2001. | ||
| Line 49: | Line 35: | ||
[[Category:1986]] | [[Category:1986]] | ||
[[Category:1980s]] | [[Category:1980s]] | ||
[[Category:20th century]] | [[Category:20th century]] | ||
[[Category:Europe]] | [[Category:Europe]] | ||
[[Category:Romania]] | [[Category:Romania]] | ||
[[Category:Political/Economic/Social Opinion]] | [[Category:Political/Economic/Social Opinion]] | ||
[[Category:Literature]] | [[Category:Literature]] | ||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Black Envelope (book), The}} | |||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="font-style: italic;">The Black Envelope</span> (book)}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="font-style: italic;">The Black Envelope</span> (book)}} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:41, 17 February 2012
Date: 1986
Region: Europe
Subject: Political/Economic/Social Opinion
Medium: Literature
Artist: Norman Manea
Confronting Bodies: Council for Socialist Culture and Education
Dates of Action: 1986
Location: Romania
Description of Artwork: While Manea's writing does not criticize the leaders of the communist Romania he lived under directly, he does write about life under the regime. In The Black Envelope, he not only writes on the negative aspects of daily life in contemporary Romania, but makes parallels to between it and Nazi Germany.
The Incident: When Manea submitted the novel in 1985, he was expected not only to have the work submitted to the censors, but to self-censor himself as well. When the manuscript was sent back to him, 80 percent of the text had objections written over it. Words such as "food lines" and "anti-Semitism" had been deemed unacceptable and he had basically been asked to rewrite most of the book.
After the novel had been revised and rejected several times, the publisher found a new censor to look over it. This censor demanded even more outrageous revisions. He saw the link Manea had made between Romania and Nazi Germany. He demanded an anti-fascist movement be included, even though Romania never had one. Hitler and Stalin's differences were to be clearly defined. The negative view of daily life was ordered to be eliminated. Characters on the brink of suicide would need to be changed to be more positive.
Results of Incident: Menea followed the orders of the censors and had The Black Envelope published. In late 1986, he emigrated to the United States. Even though he got it published, he considers The Black Envelope to be corrupt and now expresses a very pessimistic view of communist censorship.
Source: Censorship: A World Encyclopedia. Ed. Derek Jones. Chicago; London: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2001.
