Peace Begins at Home (exhibition): Difference between revisions

From Censorpedia

m (1 revision)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
====Date: [[:Category:1985 - 1995|1985 - 1995]] [[:Category:|]] [[:Category:|]]====
====Date: [[:Category:1991|1991]]====


====Region: [[:Category:North America|North America]] [[:Category:|]] [[:Category:|{location3}]]====
====Region: [[:Category:North America|North America]]====


====Subject: [[:Category:Nudity|Nudity]] [[:Category:Explicit Sexuality|Explicit Sexuality]] [[:Category:|]]====
====Subject: [[:Category:Nudity|Nudity]] [[:Category:Explicit Sexuality|Explicit Sexuality]]====


====Medium: [[:Category:Public Art|Public Art]] [[:Category:|]] [[:Category:|]]====
====Medium: [[:Category:Public Art|Public Art]], [[:Category:Photography|Photography]]====
----
----
'''Artist:''' Dr. Robert Tager, Shmuel Thaler, Catharina Marlowe
'''Artist:''' Dr. Robert Tager, Shmuel Thaler, and Catharina Marlowe


'''Confronting Bodies:''' County officials
'''Confronting Bodies:''' County officials
Line 15: Line 15:
'''Location:''' Santa Cruz, California
'''Location:''' Santa Cruz, California


'''Description of Artwork:''' All three removed photographs portrayed female nudity. A picture called "Rejoice" by Dr. Robert Tager showed the upper half of a nude woman wearing a painted Balinese mask. Also removed were Shmuel Thaler's photograph of a woman experiencing labor pains and Catharina Marlowe's photograph of a nude couple on a beach.
'''Description of Artwork:''' All three removed photographs portrayed female nudity. A picture called ''Rejoice'' by Dr. Robert Tager showed the upper half of a nude woman wearing a painted Balinese mask. Also removed were Shmuel Thaler's photograph of a woman experiencing labor pains and Catharina Marlowe's photograph of a nude couple on a beach.


'''The Incident:''' In May, 1991, three works were removed from an exhibit entitled Peace Begins at Home at the Santa Cruz County Government Center. The county's Director of Parks, Open Space and Cultural Services, Ben Angrove, ordered the works removed, saying, "a set of standards rests [in a government building] that's different from a gallery or a public place... " County officials cited concerns that children may view the works. lnterestingly, the County Children's Commission issued a letter after reviewing the exhibit saying that "All Commissioners were concerned about the probability that 'children' were 'used' to justify censorship."
'''The Incident:''' ''Peace Begins at Home''was displayed at the Santa Cruz County Government Center. The county's Director of Parks, Open Space and Cultural Services, Ben Angrove, ordered the works removed, saying, "a set of standards rests [in a government building] that's different from a gallery or a public place... " County officials cited concerns that children may view the works. lnterestingly, the County Children's Commission issued a letter after reviewing the exhibit saying that "All Commissioners were concerned about the probability that 'children' were 'used' to justify censorship."


'''Results of Incident:''' As a result of the Santa Cruz controversy, applications sent to prospective exhibitors now remind artists that their work will be displayed in a public arena, frequented by citizens with diverse opinions. The Santa Cruz County Arts Council also urged the County of Santa Cruz to "strongly express support for freedom of artistic expression... [and] make clear that conformity for its own sake is not encouraged, and that no undue preference will be given to any particular style or school of thought... even if that expression is occasionally controversial and offensive to some members of our community."
'''Results of Incident:''' As a result of the Santa Cruz controversy, applications sent to prospective exhibitors now remind artists that their work will be displayed in a public arena, frequented by citizens with diverse opinions. The Santa Cruz County Arts Council also urged the County of Santa Cruz to "strongly express support for freedom of artistic expression... [and] make clear that conformity for its own sake is not encouraged, and that no undue preference will be given to any particular style or school of thought... even if that expression is occasionally controversial and offensive to some members of our community."
Line 23: Line 23:
'''Source:''' People for the American Way
'''Source:''' People for the American Way


[[Category:1985 - 1995]]
[[Category:1991]]
[[Category:]]
[[Category:1990s]]
[[Category:]]
[[Category:20th century]]
[[Category:North America]]
[[Category:North America]]
[[Category:]]
[[Category:United States]]
[[Category:]]
[[Category:California]]
[[Category:Santa Cruz]]
[[Category:Nudity]]
[[Category:Nudity]]
[[Category:Explicit Sexuality]]
[[Category:Explicit Sexuality]]
[[Category:]]
[[Category:Public Art]]
[[Category:Public Art]]
[[Category:]]
[[Category:Photography]]
[[Category:]]
 
[[Category:Dr. Robert Tager, Shmuel Thaler, Catharina Marlowe]]
{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="font-style: italic;">Peace Begins at Home</span> (exhibition)}}


__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__

Latest revision as of 21:01, 15 November 2016

Date: 1991

Region: North America

Subject: Nudity Explicit Sexuality

Medium: Public Art, Photography


Artist: Dr. Robert Tager, Shmuel Thaler, and Catharina Marlowe

Confronting Bodies: County officials

Dates of Action: May 1991

Location: Santa Cruz, California

Description of Artwork: All three removed photographs portrayed female nudity. A picture called Rejoice by Dr. Robert Tager showed the upper half of a nude woman wearing a painted Balinese mask. Also removed were Shmuel Thaler's photograph of a woman experiencing labor pains and Catharina Marlowe's photograph of a nude couple on a beach.

The Incident: Peace Begins at Homewas displayed at the Santa Cruz County Government Center. The county's Director of Parks, Open Space and Cultural Services, Ben Angrove, ordered the works removed, saying, "a set of standards rests [in a government building] that's different from a gallery or a public place... " County officials cited concerns that children may view the works. lnterestingly, the County Children's Commission issued a letter after reviewing the exhibit saying that "All Commissioners were concerned about the probability that 'children' were 'used' to justify censorship."

Results of Incident: As a result of the Santa Cruz controversy, applications sent to prospective exhibitors now remind artists that their work will be displayed in a public arena, frequented by citizens with diverse opinions. The Santa Cruz County Arts Council also urged the County of Santa Cruz to "strongly express support for freedom of artistic expression... [and] make clear that conformity for its own sake is not encouraged, and that no undue preference will be given to any particular style or school of thought... even if that expression is occasionally controversial and offensive to some members of our community."

Source: People for the American Way