Posters prohibited in NYC: Difference between revisions
RachelShuman (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
====Region: [[:Category:North America|North America]]==== | ====Region: [[:Category:North America|North America]]==== | ||
====Subject: [[:Category: | ====Subject: [[:Category:Political/Economic/Social Opinion|Political/Economic/Social Opinion]], [[:Category:Sexual/Gender Orientation|Sexual/Gender Orientation]]==== | ||
====Medium: [[:Category:Public Art|Public Art]]==== | ====Medium: [[:Category:Public Art|Public Art]]==== | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
[[Category:New York]] | [[Category:New York]] | ||
[[Category:New York City]] | [[Category:New York City]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Political/Economic/Social Opinion]] | ||
[[Category:Sexual/Gender Orientation]] | [[Category:Sexual/Gender Orientation]] | ||
[[Category:Public Art]] | [[Category:Public Art]] | ||
Latest revision as of 21:59, 11 November 2016
Date: 1994
Region: North America
Subject: Political/Economic/Social Opinion, Sexual/Gender Orientation
Medium: Public Art
Artist: Humanist Movement
Confronting Bodies: City of New York
Dates of Action: 05/09/94; 01/09/94; 10/09/94
Location: Manhattan, New York
Description of Artwork: Posters inviting neighbors to participate in community activities; two community newspapers and a poetry reading.
The Incident: Case #1: New York "sanitation" police stops person taping poster to telephone booth, issues summons for $50. Poster was invitation to write in community newspaper. Case #2: New York "sanitation" police tracks author of posters using phone number, knocks on his door, issues three summonses for $50 each. Poster was invitation to write in community newspaper. Case #3: New York "sanitation" police delivers five summonses to owner of restaurant hosting a poetry reading. Owner lent space to neighbors, who put up the posters.
Results of Incident: Case #1: Person paid $50 fine. Case #2: Eight people, publishers of eight community newspaper, went to fight the summonses in a hearing. Finding there was no other way out, and knowing a the law cannot be enforced without proof, they denied having put up the posters, and the case was dismissed. Case #3: not yet resolved, first hearing was unresolved andadjourned.
Source: Michael Howard (NY, NY)
