Onward We March: Difference between revisions

Line 17:

As a comment, Herbst stated that the vandalism was what he had been afraid would happen to the controversial piece and explained that it was the reason why he wanted an indemnity agreement in place and insurance on the collection.

|description_of_result=The painting was removed and reexhibited. But it’s not clear that the controversy is over. Town lawyer Robert Nicola is apparently advising the town to take down all of the paintings in the collection, pending some kind of arrangement between the town and Richard Resnick, the owner of the paintings.

|image=Trumbull-mother-teresa-wide-720~~-530x331~~.png

|image=Trumbull-mother-teresa-wide-720.png

~~|source=http://ncac.org/blog/after-questionable-copyright-claim-public-library-removes-mother-teresa-painting/~~

}}

http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/Controversial-Mother-Teresa-painting-back-at-6120141.php

[http://ncac.org/blog/after-questionable-copyright-claim-public-library-removes-mother-teresa-painting/ After Questionable Copyright Claim, Public Library Removes Mother Teresa Painting], MARCH 4, 2015 NCAC.org, BY SUNNA REITOV KORPE

http://www.trumbulltimes.com/31188/controversial-painting-defaced-police-on-scene-at-trumbull-library/

[http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/Controversial-Mother-Teresa-painting-back-at-6120141.php Controversial Mother Teresa painting back at Trumbull Library], CT Post, By Keila Torres Ocasio Published 10:02 pm EST, Friday, March 6, 2015

[http://www.trumbulltimes.com/31188/controversial-painting-defaced-police-on-scene-at-trumbull-library/ Controversial painting defaced, owners speaks out on vandalism], Trumbull Times, By Kate Czaplinski on March 11, 2015

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 As a comment, Herbst stated that the vandalism was what he had been afraid would happen to the controversial piece and explained that it was the reason why he wanted an indemnity agreement in place and insurance on the collection.
 |description_of_result=The painting was removed and reexhibited. But it’s not clear that the controversy is over. Town lawyer Robert Nicola is apparently advising the town to take down all of the paintings in the collection, pending some kind of arrangement between the town and Richard Resnick, the owner of the paintings.
-|image=Trumbull-mother-teresa-wide-720-530x331.png
+|image=Trumbull-mother-teresa-wide-720.png
-|source=http://ncac.org/blog/after-questionable-copyright-claim-public-library-removes-mother-teresa-painting/
 }}
-http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/Controversial-Mother-Teresa-painting-back-at-6120141.php
+[http://ncac.org/blog/after-questionable-copyright-claim-public-library-removes-mother-teresa-painting/ After Questionable Copyright Claim, Public Library Removes Mother Teresa Painting], MARCH 4, 2015 NCAC.org, BY SUNNA REITOV KORPE
-http://www.trumbulltimes.com/31188/controversial-painting-defaced-police-on-scene-at-trumbull-library/
+[http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/Controversial-Mother-Teresa-painting-back-at-6120141.php Controversial Mother Teresa painting back at Trumbull Library], CT Post, By Keila Torres Ocasio Published 10:02 pm EST, Friday, March 6, 2015
+[http://www.trumbulltimes.com/31188/controversial-painting-defaced-police-on-scene-at-trumbull-library/ Controversial painting defaced, owners speaks out on vandalism], Trumbull Times, By Kate Czaplinski on March 11, 2015