No Trace of The Blonde: Difference between revisions
RachelShuman (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
RachelShuman (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
'''Description of Artwork:''' Hughes described No Trace of The Blonde as exploring "the suppression and anxiety surrounding powerful female sexuality... The work will be created for up to five performers with two pubescent girls, black and white, about 12 years old, as the main characters." The work's three sources of research and inspiration would be "Carmella," a 19th-century vampire short story; the Afro-Haitian religion Santeria; and early 20th-century surrealist women painters. | '''Description of Artwork:''' Hughes described No Trace of The Blonde as exploring "the suppression and anxiety surrounding powerful female sexuality... The work will be created for up to five performers with two pubescent girls, black and white, about 12 years old, as the main characters." The work's three sources of research and inspiration would be "Carmella," a 19th-century vampire short story; the Afro-Haitian religion Santeria; and early 20th-century surrealist women painters. | ||
'''The Incident:''' Even before | '''The Incident:''' Even before No Trace of The Blonde had been written, the Southern Baptist Christian Life Commission challenged the work, charging, incorrectly, that two 12-year-olds were to cast in the NEA funded work dealing with lesbianism. Hughe's grant was used by the religious right to argue that Congress had not "reformed" the NEA and should remove it from the federal budget. | ||
'''Results of Incident:''' Hughes released a statement refuting the far right accusations, "Neither Ms. Sebastian or I have any intention of using actual 12-year-old or adolescent actors in this project. These characters may be represented by myself with another adult actor... or in some other way." Congress voted to continue tax support for the NEA. | '''Results of Incident:''' Hughes released a statement refuting the far right accusations, "Neither Ms. Sebastian or I have any intention of using actual 12-year-old or adolescent actors in this project. These characters may be represented by myself with another adult actor... or in some other way." Congress voted to continue tax support for the NEA. | ||
Revision as of 16:00, 26 July 2011
Date: 1991
Region: North America
Subject: Sexual/Gender Orientation
Medium: Performing Art
Artist: Holly Hughes and Ellen Sebastian
Confronting Bodies: Christian Right
Dates of Action: 1991
Location: New York City
Description of Artwork: Hughes described No Trace of The Blonde as exploring "the suppression and anxiety surrounding powerful female sexuality... The work will be created for up to five performers with two pubescent girls, black and white, about 12 years old, as the main characters." The work's three sources of research and inspiration would be "Carmella," a 19th-century vampire short story; the Afro-Haitian religion Santeria; and early 20th-century surrealist women painters.
The Incident: Even before No Trace of The Blonde had been written, the Southern Baptist Christian Life Commission challenged the work, charging, incorrectly, that two 12-year-olds were to cast in the NEA funded work dealing with lesbianism. Hughe's grant was used by the religious right to argue that Congress had not "reformed" the NEA and should remove it from the federal budget.
Results of Incident: Hughes released a statement refuting the far right accusations, "Neither Ms. Sebastian or I have any intention of using actual 12-year-old or adolescent actors in this project. These characters may be represented by myself with another adult actor... or in some other way." Congress voted to continue tax support for the NEA.
Source: Artistic Freedom Under Attack 1992
