Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire: Difference between revisions
From Censorpedia
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
====Region: [[:Category:North America|North America]]==== | ====Region: [[:Category:North America|North America]]==== | ||
====Subject: [[:Category: | ====Subject: [[:Category:Explicit Sexuality|Explicit Sexuality]]==== | ||
====Medium: [[:Category:Public Art|Public Art]]==== | ====Medium: [[:Category:Public Art|Public Art]]==== | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
[[Category:United States]] | [[Category:United States]] | ||
[[Category:New Hampshire]] | [[Category:New Hampshire]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Explicit Sexuality]] | ||
[[Category:Fighting Words]] | [[Category:Fighting Words]] | ||
[[Category:Public Art]] | [[Category:Public Art]] |
Latest revision as of 16:49, 13 February 2017
Date: 1942
Region: North America
Subject: Explicit Sexuality
Medium: Public Art
Artist: Chaplinsky
Confronting Bodies: State of New Hampshire
Dates of Action: 1942
Location: New Hampshire
Description of Artwork: Exchange of insults on the street.
The Incident: "Under NH.'s Offensive Conduct law (chap.378, para. 2 of the H.Public Laws) it is illegal for anyone to address another person with 'any offensive, derisive or annoying word to anyone who is lawfully in any street or public place.'"
Results of Incident: The case went to the Supreme Court which declared that the case did not fall under the category of "fighting words" and was not protected by the laws pertaining to free speech.
Source: the Encyclopedia of Censorship, J. Green, Facts on File, '93 pg.48