Talk:Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation: Difference between revisions
From Censorpedia
Jackie Sider (talk | contribs) (Created page with "This article is missing a considerable amount of information --~~~~") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This article is missing a considerable amount of information --[[User:Jackie Sider|Jackie Sider]] 11:50, 3 February 2012 (PST) | This article is missing a considerable amount of information --[[User:Jackie Sider|Jackie Sider]] 11:50, 3 February 2012 (PST) | ||
There has been a recent Supreme Court decision relating to the lack of clear definition of indecency on the airwaves at the FCC, especially with the proliferation of cable and on-demand channels where no such restrictions exist. Consequently, there is speculation that the Pacifica "Carlin" decision should be revisited and thrown out altogether. | |||
Latest revision as of 19:19, 29 August 2012
This article is missing a considerable amount of information --Jackie Sider 11:50, 3 February 2012 (PST)
There has been a recent Supreme Court decision relating to the lack of clear definition of indecency on the airwaves at the FCC, especially with the proliferation of cable and on-demand channels where no such restrictions exist. Consequently, there is speculation that the Pacifica "Carlin" decision should be revisited and thrown out altogether.
