Main Page: Difference between revisions

From Censorpedia

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
{{Display censorship incident
{{Display censorship incident
|ongoing=no
|ongoing=no
|year=2017
|year=2020
|region=North America
|region=North America
|artist=Arthur and Albert Runquist
|artist=Xandra Ibarra
|subject=Political/Economic/Social Opinion
|subject=Sexual/Gender Orientation
|confronting_bodies=University of Oregon
|confronting_bodies=San Antonio Department of Arts & Culture
|medium=Public Art
|medium=Film Video
|date_of_action=February 2020
|location=San Antonio, Texas
|location=Eugene, Oregon
|description_of_content=Created in 2014 from a live 2004 performance, Ibarra’s work addresses race and gender stereotypes through the artist’s performance as a minstrel Mexican housewife who takes on her “racial bondage to hot sauce, tacos, and demographic panic” in a humorous retro border corrida.
|description_of_content=Knight Library opened at the University of Oregon in 1937 as a monument to the WPA public works program in the Depression-Era (as this program sponsored the construction of this building). The building is recognized as epitomizing a display of integrated design and is thus included in the National Register of Historic Places as of 1990.The murals which sparked controversy are Arthur and Albert Runquist's "The Development of Art" and "The Development of Science," which contains eight vignettes that present a racist hierarchal structure linked to biased ideals of race and civilization of the 19th century. The artists were brothers and University of Oregon graduates, associated with "progressive" politics. Additionally, the mural titled "The Mission of the University," which resembles a medieval manuscript but details the language of a 1909 speech by Frederick Young, a University Sociology professor; in the speech, Young stated: “From now on it must be a climb if our nation is to hold its position among the nations of the Earth. It means conservation and betterment not merely of our national resources but also of our racial heritage and of opportunity to the lowliest.
|description_of_incident=Suzy González and Michael Menchaca, under their collective name “Dos Mestizx,” curated the exhibition “XicanX: New Visions” celebrating Chicano art at Centro de Artes, a downtown gallery owned by and funded by the City of San Antonio Department of Arts & Culture. On the day of the opening, Ibarra’s video work “Spictacle II: La Tortillera” was removed upon orders from the city, despite the curators complying with city requests to curtain off the work with advisory signage. San Antonio’s Department of Arts & Culture removed the artwork by Xandra Ibarra from this exhibition because of apparent discomfort with its unconventional representations of sexuality and the challenge it presents to gender stereotypes.  
|description_of_incident=University of Oregon students protested three murals that were installed in the library's east and west stairwells when the library opened in 1937. Student protests began in 2017, with a petition -- which gained over 1,750 student advocates -- filed in November 2017 calling for the University's removal of the mural "The Mission of the University." In February 2017, the Knight Library Public Task Force was created to educate the University of Oregon community about the history of the building as well as information about how to respond to the building's controversial art while respecting first amendment-protected free expression.
 
|description_of_result=With regard to "The Mission of the University," librarians cleaned the mural, removingthe red paint, and posted a placard adjacent to the mural which recognizing the defacement with a written statement and a photo documenting the act. The murals were covered with aluminum panels in September 2020, the cost of which came to approximately $30,000.00.
San Antonio’s city attorney determined that the work violated a Texas statute disallowing “obscene content,” despite the work not meeting the legal definition of obscenity upheld in Miller v. California (1973), which exempts material with “serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.” Ibarra is a well-recognized performance artist. Her work has been shown in museums and other established venues like El Museo de Arte Contemporañeo (Bogotá, Colombia), the Broad Museum (LA, USA), ExTeresa Arte Actual (DF, Mexico), PPOW Gallery (NYC), Anderson Collection (Stanford) and the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts (SF). The work in question has been exhibited nationally and internationally, including at Centro Nacional de las Artes in Mexico City, and the National Museum of Women in the Arts in Washington, DC.
|image=DefacementSign-450x637-1.jpg
|description_of_result=Despite a determination that the work did have serious artistic value, the Arts Commission voted to leave the final decision to the director of the Department of Arts & Culture, Debbie Racca-Sittre. Racca-Sittre has stated that she has no intention of returning the video work to the exhibition.
|source=https://around.uoregon.edu/content/uo-moves-cover-controversial-murals-knight-library#:~:text=In%20a%20move%20to%20acknowledge, and%20imagery%20to%20be%20covered, https://library.uoregon.edu/sites/default/files/pastisprologue web 0.pdf, https://library.uoregon.edu/public-art-forum, https://researchguides.uoregon.edu/historic-knight, https://livingnewdeal.org/tag/cultural-memory-and-anti-racism/
|image=IBARRA-600x337.png
|source=https://ncac.org/news/san-antonio-censors-queer-latina-performance-artist-xandra-ibarra, https://aldianews.com/articles/culture/social/art-and-censorship-artists-too-spicy-video-has-censored-city-san-antonio, https://therivardreport.com/centro-de-artes-subcommittee-unanimously-approves-censored-video/, https://www.kqed.org/arts/13875472/texas-city-censors-oakland-artist-xandra-ibarras-obscene-feminist-video, https://hyperallergic.com/544286/xandra-ibarra/
}}
}}


<br>
<br>

Revision as of 15:16, 2 March 2021

Featured Case: Knight Library Murals (University of Oregon)


IBARRA-600x337.png

Artist: Xandra Ibarra

Year: 2020

Date of Action:

Region: North America

Location: San Antonio, Texas

Subject: Sexual/Gender Orientation

Medium: Film Video

Confronting Bodies: San Antonio Department of Arts & Culture

Description of Artwork: Created in 2014 from a live 2004 performance, Ibarra’s work addresses race and gender stereotypes through the artist’s performance as a minstrel Mexican housewife who takes on her “racial bondage to hot sauce, tacos, and demographic panic” in a humorous retro border corrida.

The Incident: Suzy González and Michael Menchaca, under their collective name “Dos Mestizx,” curated the exhibition “XicanX: New Visions” celebrating Chicano art at Centro de Artes, a downtown gallery owned by and funded by the City of San Antonio Department of Arts & Culture. On the day of the opening, Ibarra’s video work “Spictacle II: La Tortillera” was removed upon orders from the city, despite the curators complying with city requests to curtain off the work with advisory signage. San Antonio’s Department of Arts & Culture removed the artwork by Xandra Ibarra from this exhibition because of apparent discomfort with its unconventional representations of sexuality and the challenge it presents to gender stereotypes.

San Antonio’s city attorney determined that the work violated a Texas statute disallowing “obscene content,” despite the work not meeting the legal definition of obscenity upheld in Miller v. California (1973), which exempts material with “serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.” Ibarra is a well-recognized performance artist. Her work has been shown in museums and other established venues like El Museo de Arte Contemporañeo (Bogotá, Colombia), the Broad Museum (LA, USA), ExTeresa Arte Actual (DF, Mexico), PPOW Gallery (NYC), Anderson Collection (Stanford) and the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts (SF). The work in question has been exhibited nationally and internationally, including at Centro Nacional de las Artes in Mexico City, and the National Museum of Women in the Arts in Washington, DC.

Results of Incident: Despite a determination that the work did have serious artistic value, the Arts Commission voted to leave the final decision to the director of the Department of Arts & Culture, Debbie Racca-Sittre. Racca-Sittre has stated that she has no intention of returning the video work to the exhibition.

Source:
https://ncac.org/news/san-antonio-censors-queer-latina-performance-artist-xandra-ibarra,
https://aldianews.com/articles/culture/social/art-and-censorship-artists-too-spicy-video-has-censored-city-san-antonio,
https://therivardreport.com/centro-de-artes-subcommittee-unanimously-approves-censored-video/,
https://www.kqed.org/arts/13875472/texas-city-censors-oakland-artist-xandra-ibarras-obscene-feminist-video,
https://hyperallergic.com/544286/xandra-ibarra/


































What is Censorpedia?

Censorpedia is a crowdsourced online database of censorship cases within the arts and in culture. It is aimed at those researching censorship, at activists working for freedom of expression and at artists and other cultural producers whose expression has been subject to censorship or attempted censorship.

Censorpedia documents censorship incidents by providing the who, what, when, where and why. By providing a repository of information about what is vulnerable to censorship and about the strategies and tactics that have defeated previous’ censorship attempts, Censorpedia aids the fight for free expression.

Researchers can search for a specific case, year or keyword using the search box, as well as browse by medium, by grounds for censorship, or explore a random case.

Activists can search for ongoing cases or contribute a case that is ongoing or recently resolved.

Artists and cultural producers are similarly invited to add cases they are directly involved with or are familiar with first hand.

Censorpedia builds on the landmark 1994 art project The File Room, initiated by Muntadas.

For more information about censorship visit our Annotated Bibliography


Feel free to:

Browse censorship cases by:


Censorpedia Terms of Use