Mapplethorpe: The Perfect Moment (exhibition): Difference between revisions
RachelShuman (talk | contribs) |
RachelShuman (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
'''Source:''' Committee For Artists' Rights Archive | '''Source:''' Committee For Artists' Rights Archive | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="font-style: italic;">Mapplethorpe: The Perfect Moment</span> (exhibition)}} | |||
[[Category:1990]] | [[Category:1990]] | ||
| Line 35: | Line 37: | ||
[[Category:Nudity]] | [[Category:Nudity]] | ||
[[Category:Photography]] | [[Category:Photography]] | ||
[[Category:Robert Mapplethorpe | [[Category:Robert Mapplethorpe]] | ||
[[Category:Contemporary Arts Center]] | [[Category:Contemporary Arts Center]] | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
Revision as of 19:07, 1 August 2011
Date: 1990
Region: North America
Subject: Sexual/Gender Orientation, Explicit Sexuality, Nudity
Medium: Photography
Artist: Robert Mapplethorpe, Contemporary Arts Center
Confronting Bodies: Cincinnati City officials
Dates of Action: 1990
Location:
Description of Artwork: A retrospective show for the late Robert Mapplethorpe including many nudes, some of children, flowers, and sadomasochistic activities.
The Incident: Officials of the Contemporary Arts Center of Cincinnati tried to be prudent: they restricted access to the museum to those over 18 and relegated the most disturbing and explicit of the 175 photographs to a separate, further isolated room. This was not enough, however, to keep a local sheriff from staging a raid on the exhibit and seeking indictments against museum director Dennis Barrie on obscenity charges; nor was it enough to keep the grand jury from handing up an indictment. Judge David J. Albanese of the Hamilton County court ruled earlier this month that the charges had to go to trial and that the five designated "obscene" photographs cannot even be considered in the context of the entire Mapplethorpe show.
Results of Incident: Dennis Barrie was acquitted but has since left the CAC. The exhibition is still used as fodder in the battle for NEA reauthorization and funding.
Source: Committee For Artists' Rights Archive
