Holt, Rinehart and Winston Health Textbook: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision) |
RachelShuman (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====Date: [[:Category: | ====Date: [[:Category:1994|1994]]==== | ||
====Region: [[:Category:North America|North America | ====Region: [[:Category:North America|North America]]==== | ||
====Subject: [[:Category:Explicit Sexuality|Explicit Sexuality | ====Subject: [[:Category:Explicit Sexuality|Explicit Sexuality]]==== | ||
====Medium: [[:Category:Literature|Literature | ====Medium: [[:Category:Literature|Literature]]==== | ||
---- | ---- | ||
'''Artist:''' Holt, Rinehart and Winston | '''Artist:''' Holt, Rinehart and Winston | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
'''Location:''' Austin, Texas | '''Location:''' Austin, Texas | ||
'''Description of Artwork:''' Five health textbooks | '''Description of Artwork:''' Five health textbooks, including one published by Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc. | ||
'''The Incident:''' | '''The Incident:''' Texas Board of Education held hearings in which family-planning, anti-abortion, gay-advocacy, fundamentalist Christian, and other groups debated the merits of five health texts, written by Holt and four other publishers. The board, which buys all textbooks for the state, last month requested a total of 400 revisions in the five texts, with the largest percentage of them for the Holt book, including the deletion of toll-free numbers for gay and lesbian groups and for teenage suicide prevention groups. The state wanted to see passages on homosexuality abridged, the addition of language describing Texas's sodomy laws, and the deletion of a number of clinical illustrations, including a self-examination for testicular cancer and two comparing circumcised and uncircumcised penises. | ||
'''Results of Incident:''' Holt refused to make changes. | '''Results of Incident:''' Holt refused to make changes.Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc. decided to pull its 700-page high school health text out of the huge Texas textbook market not only because making scores of requested revisions was economically unfeasible but also because ethical issues were at stake. | ||
'''Source:''' | '''Source:''' [http://www.nytimes.com/1994/03/17/us/publisher-pulls-a-textbook-in-furror-on-sexual-content.html New York Times Article] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:1994]] | ||
[[Category:]] | [[Category:1990s]] | ||
[[Category:]] | [[Category:20th century]] | ||
[[Category:North America]] | [[Category:North America]] | ||
[[Category:]] | [[Category:United States]] | ||
[[Category:]] | [[Category:Texas]] | ||
[[Category:Austin]] | |||
[[Category:Explicit Sexuality]] | [[Category:Explicit Sexuality]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Education]] | ||
[[Category:Literature]] | [[Category:Literature]] | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
Latest revision as of 15:41, 9 August 2011
Date: 1994
Region: North America
Subject: Explicit Sexuality
Medium: Literature
Artist: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
Confronting Bodies: State of Texas
Dates of Action: March 1994
Location: Austin, Texas
Description of Artwork: Five health textbooks, including one published by Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc.
The Incident: Texas Board of Education held hearings in which family-planning, anti-abortion, gay-advocacy, fundamentalist Christian, and other groups debated the merits of five health texts, written by Holt and four other publishers. The board, which buys all textbooks for the state, last month requested a total of 400 revisions in the five texts, with the largest percentage of them for the Holt book, including the deletion of toll-free numbers for gay and lesbian groups and for teenage suicide prevention groups. The state wanted to see passages on homosexuality abridged, the addition of language describing Texas's sodomy laws, and the deletion of a number of clinical illustrations, including a self-examination for testicular cancer and two comparing circumcised and uncircumcised penises.
Results of Incident: Holt refused to make changes.Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc. decided to pull its 700-page high school health text out of the huge Texas textbook market not only because making scores of requested revisions was economically unfeasible but also because ethical issues were at stake.
Source: New York Times Article
