Talk:Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation

Add topic
There are no discussions on this page.

This article is missing a considerable amount of information --Jackie Sider 11:50, 3 February 2012 (PST)


There has been a recent Supreme Court decision relating to the lack of clear definition of indecency on the airwaves at the FCC, especially with the proliferation of cable and on-demand channels where no such restrictions exist. Consequently, there is speculation that the Pacifica "Carlin" decision should be revisited and thrown out altogether.

Return to "Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation" page.