Arundhati Roy: Difference between revisions

From Censorpedia

No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
====Subject: [[:Category:Political/Economic/Social Opinion|Political/Economic/Social Opinion]]====
====Subject: [[:Category:Political/Economic/Social Opinion|Political/Economic/Social Opinion]]====


====Medium: [[:Category:Public Art|Public Art]], [[:Category:Personal Opinion|Personal Opinion]]====
====Medium: [[:Category:Public Art|Public Art]]====
----
----
'''Artist:''' Arundhati Roy
'''Artist:''' Arundhati Roy
Line 33: Line 33:
[[Category:Political/Economic/Social Opinion]]
[[Category:Political/Economic/Social Opinion]]
[[Category:Public Art]]
[[Category:Public Art]]
[[Category:Personal Opinion]]
[[Category:Arundhati Roy]]
[[Category:Arundhati Roy]]


__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
  {{DEFAULTSORT:Roy, Arundhati}}
  {{DEFAULTSORT:Roy, Arundhati}}

Latest revision as of 19:42, 9 November 2016

Date: 1961 - Present

Region: Asia

Subject: Political/Economic/Social Opinion

Medium: Public Art


Artist: Arundhati Roy

Confronting Bodies: Government court of India

Dates of Action: March, 2002

Location: Narmada Valley, India

Description of Artwork: The award-winning novelist, Arundhati Roy, suggested that a government panel sought to "muzzle dissent." This came while he voiced his opposition to the erection of a dam that was also protested by local farmers.

The Incident: Protesters in the Narmada Valley feared that their homes could be flooded if the dam is built. Roy stood beside the protesters in their objection.

Results of Incident: Roy was jailed for one day, after Justice RP Sethi said that the freedom of speech did not grant anyone license to scandalize the court or lower its dignity.

Source: Frontline, BBC [[Category:21st century