Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
===The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Holding===  
===The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Holding===  
====Decision====
====Decision====
A three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals reversed in a 2-1 decision, with each of the three judges writing separately.
On March 17th, 1997, a three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals reversed in a 2-1 decision, with each of the three judges writing separately.
=====Majority Opinion=====
=====Majority Opinion=====
One judge argued that the FCC's order was invalid on the grounds that
One judge argued that the FCC's order was invalid on the grounds that
Line 29: Line 29:
==External Links==
==External Links==
[http://www.erenkrantz.com/Humor/SevenDirtyWords.shtml Original Sketch]
[http://www.erenkrantz.com/Humor/SevenDirtyWords.shtml Original Sketch]
[http://ftp.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/556/556.F2d.9.75-1391.html]
435

edits