Meta-Analytic Examination of Assumed Properties of Child Sexual Abuse: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{Display censorship incident |ongoing=no |year=1999 |region=North America |artist=Psychological Bulletin |subject=Science, Sexual/Gender Orientation, Youth |confronting_bodie...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|region=North America | |region=North America | ||
|artist=Psychological Bulletin | |artist=Psychological Bulletin | ||
|subject= | |subject=Political/Economic/Social Opinion, Sexual/Gender Orientation | ||
|confronting_bodies=Congress | |confronting_bodies=Congress | ||
|medium=Literature | |||
|date_of_action=July 1999 | |date_of_action=July 1999 | ||
|location=Washington D.C. | |location=Washington D.C. | ||
|description_of_content=This scientific article, published in an American Psychological Association publication analyzes a number of other studies examining how sexual encounters in childhood affected college students, finding that on average, students who had experienced childhood sexual abuse were only slightly less well-adjusted. | |description_of_content=This scientific article, published in an American Psychological Association publication analyzes a number of other studies examining how sexual encounters in childhood affected college students, finding that on average, students who had experienced childhood sexual abuse were only slightly less well-adjusted. | ||
|description_of_incident=After Dr. Laura and others began a crusade against the article, which they alleged "normalized pedophilia" among other things, congress voted 355-0 to condemn the article. Congress sought to suppress the study and denounced "all suggestions in the article . . . that indicate that sexual relationships between adults and 'willing' children are less harmful than believed and might be positive for 'willing' children.'' | |description_of_incident=After Dr. Laura and others began a crusade against the article, which they alleged "normalized pedophilia" among other things, congress voted 355-0 to condemn the article. Congress sought to suppress the study and denounced "all suggestions in the article . . . that indicate that sexual relationships between adults and 'willing' children are less harmful than believed and might be positive for 'willing' children.'' | ||
|description_of_result=The APA defended the article and its research, leaders in congress continued its denunciations. | |description_of_result=The APA defended the article and its research, leaders in congress continued its denunciations. | ||
|source=http://reason.com/archives/1999/08/07/washingtons-other-sex-scandal | |source=http://reason.com/archives/1999/08/07/washingtons-other-sex-scandal | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:23, 15 November 2016
Artist: Psychological Bulletin
Year: 1999
Date of Action: July 1999
Region: North America
Location: Washington D.C.
Subject: Political/Economic/Social Opinion, Sexual/Gender Orientation
Medium: Literature
Confronting Bodies: Congress
Description of Artwork: This scientific article, published in an American Psychological Association publication analyzes a number of other studies examining how sexual encounters in childhood affected college students, finding that on average, students who had experienced childhood sexual abuse were only slightly less well-adjusted.
The Incident: After Dr. Laura and others began a crusade against the article, which they alleged "normalized pedophilia" among other things, congress voted 355-0 to condemn the article. Congress sought to suppress the study and denounced "all suggestions in the article . . . that indicate that sexual relationships between adults and 'willing' children are less harmful than believed and might be positive for 'willing' children.
Results of Incident: The APA defended the article and its research, leaders in congress continued its denunciations.
Source:
• http://reason.com/archives/1999/08/07/washingtons-other-sex-scandal
