65
edits
New York v. Dick (1979): Difference between revisions
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|description_of_result=In court, some discussions on whether the iguana was a "work of art" or a "sign" clarified some complications surrounding the conflict. It was established that the iguana is in fact a work of art. The judge expressed the opinion that "work of art" and "sign" are mutually exclusive categories, and, thusly, the Cafe was found not guilty. | |description_of_result=In court, some discussions on whether the iguana was a "work of art" or a "sign" clarified some complications surrounding the conflict. It was established that the iguana is in fact a work of art. The judge expressed the opinion that "work of art" and "sign" are mutually exclusive categories, and, thusly, the Cafe was found not guilty. | ||
|image=10cityroom-ready-custom2.jpg | |image=10cityroom-ready-custom2.jpg | ||
|source=http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/13/iquana/ | |||
}} | }} | ||