To the Republicans, Democrats and Bi-Partisans: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 22: Line 22:
'''Results of Incident:''' The artists, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union of Washington and supported by the National Coalition Against Censorship and First Amendment Project, sued the city. In 2001, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that artists Sharon Rupp and Janette Hopper’s First Amendment rights were violated when the city of Pasco excluded their artwork from the exhibition. The Court rejected the city’s arguments that the censorship was justified on the basis that children might have seen the pieces. The court noted, “The mere fact that the works caused controversy is, of course, patently insufficient to justify their suppression.”
'''Results of Incident:''' The artists, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union of Washington and supported by the National Coalition Against Censorship and First Amendment Project, sued the city. In 2001, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that artists Sharon Rupp and Janette Hopper’s First Amendment rights were violated when the city of Pasco excluded their artwork from the exhibition. The Court rejected the city’s arguments that the censorship was justified on the basis that children might have seen the pieces. The court noted, “The mere fact that the works caused controversy is, of course, patently insufficient to justify their suppression.”


'''Source:''' First Amendment Project, NCAC
'''Source:''' First Amendment Project, NCAC, http://www.uncp.edu/art/hopper/Adam%20and%20Eve%20Print/gallery.htm


[[Category:1996]]
[[Category:1996]]
1,861

edits