Gwen (painting): Difference between revisions
RachelShuman (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
RachelShuman (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
====Medium: [[:Category:Painting|Painting]]==== | ====Medium: [[:Category:Painting|Painting]]==== | ||
---- | ---- | ||
[[File:Gwen.jpg|right|200 px|frame|Image obtained from the Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression | [[File:Gwen.jpg|right|200 px|frame|Image obtained from the Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression ''Art on Trial'' site]] | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
'''Description of Artwork:''' This oil painting depicts a seated nude woman with crossed arms and legs; one of her breasts is partially exposed. | '''Description of Artwork:''' This oil painting depicts a seated nude woman with crossed arms and legs; one of her breasts is partially exposed. | ||
'''The Incident:''' After viewing the painting, Laurie Crowder submitted a sexual harassment complaint to the city Legal Department. She claimed that City Hall was her workplace, and the painting made it a hostile environment. City officials therefore removed the painting | '''The Incident:''' After viewing the painting, Laurie Crowder submitted a sexual harassment complaint to the city's Legal Department. She claimed that City Hall was her workplace, and the painting made it a hostile environment. City officials therefore removed the painting | ||
'''Results of Incident:''' Henderson filed a suit against the city for violating her First Amendment rights. On March 27, 1997, a U.S. district judge ruled in favor of Henderson, noting the fact that it was a public space. The city's art policy was changed to give the city manager, who enforces harassment policies, final say over rotunda displays. | '''Results of Incident:''' Henderson filed a suit against the city for violating her First Amendment rights. On March 27, 1997, a U.S. district judge ruled in favor of Henderson, noting the fact that it was a public space. The city's art policy was changed to give the city manager, who enforces harassment policies, final say over rotunda displays. |
Latest revision as of 19:17, 28 July 2011
Date: 1995
Region: North America
Subject: Nudity
Medium: Painting
Artist: Maxine Henderson
Confronting Bodies: Laurie Crowder, an assistant superintendent for Murfreesboro City Schools; City Officials
Dates of Action: October 1995
Location: City Hall rotunda, Murfreesboro, Tennessee
Description of Artwork: This oil painting depicts a seated nude woman with crossed arms and legs; one of her breasts is partially exposed.
The Incident: After viewing the painting, Laurie Crowder submitted a sexual harassment complaint to the city's Legal Department. She claimed that City Hall was her workplace, and the painting made it a hostile environment. City officials therefore removed the painting
Results of Incident: Henderson filed a suit against the city for violating her First Amendment rights. On March 27, 1997, a U.S. district judge ruled in favor of Henderson, noting the fact that it was a public space. The city's art policy was changed to give the city manager, who enforces harassment policies, final say over rotunda displays.
Source: The Tennessean, 3.1.96, Time Magazine, 3.23.98, NCAC